Showing posts with label Multimedia critique. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Multimedia critique. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Great photos, but the Flash needs work


I looked at Kadir van Lohuizen's “Katrina Diaspora” project at Noor, a small photo agency out of the Netherlands. This is an important topic and, so, is appropriate subject matter. Even though Katrina is thought of as over by many of us who were untouched by the hurricane, many still have to live with the consequences. The photos, black and whites, are clear and show a variety of content and angles. That said, it seems like almost everything else could use work.

First, I think that this project could have greatly benefited from audio. Hearing the voices of the subjects would help the viewer to sympathize with their plight. Also, hearing the sounds of the apartment complex and the places the characters go would add another dimension of reality to the situation.

Noor seems to have a flash template which all projects follow. This isn’t a bad thing so long as the template is well designed. Unfortunately, theirs leaves much to be desired. The photograph is displayed largely, but the caption, which appear upon rolling over the photo, manifests as a large black box that blocks most of the photo. It seems that narrow horizontal caption boxes would be far less distracting and would detract less from the photography. The play/stop button floats awkwardly on the right, unaligned with anything. If the photos are treated as a slideshow, each photo takes a second loading. While the photo roll at the top is an interesting feature for navigation, it is distracting when it moves as the photo changes.

It's nice that the user has a choice between scrolling though the photos using the arrow keys or clicking through the photo roll, the photo roll has a few issues with navigation. It’s difficult to tell which photo is currently on the screen. It appears that the designer tried darkening the unselected photos, but it would be better if the current photo were greater highlighted, perhaps by using a white outline or further lightening the picture. Also, if the user clicks on a photo to select, the roll pushes that photo past the back arrow and the next photo is only half visible on the far left. This is a major problem as it impedes the user’s navigation. Finally, the “View All” page could stand improvement. All of the photographs are lined up in four rows, but none of them take the user to that photograph enlarged.

Greater attention needs to be paid to the user’s experience in the project.While the photos are well executed, the over all project could be implemented better.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Humility doesn't mean you have to be small...



I reviewed a multimedia flash project run on the Chattanooga Times Free Press called "Humility in hard times". It tells stories of people whose lives have been affected by the recession as well as of those who lived through both the Great Depression and the recession. This concept is very compelling, and the content could work great for a project. Comparing the history to the present in this way can help us to gain some perspective and guidance in dealing with these issues.


This topic was well-suited to a flash project as the project has two chapters (one each for the recession and the Depression). And has four stories in each chapter. Additionally, the “about” link has an interview with two of the four creators


When navigating to the page, the first problem with this project is immediately clear. The entire project was made too small. The text is barely legible. It’s unfortunate because there is clearly much more room on the Web page, and I’m sure the text is very compelling. Furthermore, the text is white on black serif. Being this small, it becomes hardly legible. The banner is done successfully in a sans serif that should have been used throughout the whole project.


The project works design-wise. The visuals are given the most real estate while there is a space for explanation underneath. The thumbnails for the other four stories line up vertically on the left and the navigation for other parts of the project are located at the bottom left. Quotations from each section run across the top in a banner like area. The only problem is that there is too much real estate given to this area.


Additionally, there are too few visuals to warrant creating a flash slideshow. In many there are only two or three portraits. They don’t tell us much more about the story or the person. It think it would have been better to have either only one photo or at least enough so that they could change every three to five seconds.


Overall, very interesting concept but could have been executed better.